<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sentilla Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wsnblog.com/2007/10/17/the-sentilla-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wsnblog.com/2007/10/17/the-sentilla-hype/</link>
	<description>New products, books, conferences, papers, wsn for development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alexmajy</title>
		<link>http://www.wsnblog.com/2007/10/17/the-sentilla-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-15216</link>
		<dc:creator>alexmajy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wsnblog.com/2007/10/17/the-sentilla-hype/#comment-15216</guid>
		<description>I have not experiences with WSNs dev in Java. So I don&#039;t konw whether Java could bring developer better experience or/and productivity. But I see the next step of WSNs should consist of more powerful hardware, more powerful IDE, various interface to upper software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not experiences with WSNs dev in Java. So I don&#8217;t konw whether Java could bring developer better experience or/and productivity. But I see the next step of WSNs should consist of more powerful hardware, more powerful IDE, various interface to upper software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
